How Theatrical Arts Could Transform Under a Second Trump Administration

by Chris Peterson, OnStage Blog Founder

Donald Trump is going to be the next President of the United States. His definitive victory this week made it very clear where this country is heading in many aspects and how various industries will be impacted by his coming administration.

Theatrical arts, like many creative industries, can be significantly shaped by political landscapes. With the reelection of Donald Trump, we have to consider the potential impact of his administration’s policies on funding, social dynamics, and cultural messaging in the arts.

Here’s an exploration of how Trump’s policies, political priorities, and cultural perspectives could alter the theatrical arts in the U.S.

Funding and Support for the Arts

Arts funding has been a topic of contention under Trump’s leadership. During his first term, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and other federally funded arts programs faced recurring threats of budget cuts, and Trump’s proposed budgets consistently recommended eliminating the NEA entirely. Despite these proposals, bipartisan Congressional support preserved funding levels.

However, a second Trump administration could renew attempts to defund the NEA, potentially leading to a significant reduction in support for theaters across the nation, especially smaller and community-based ones reliant on federal grants.

The loss of NEA funding would disproportionately affect theatres in certain areas, public schools, and non-profit organizations committed to bringing diverse voices to the stage. Major theatres, private schools and larger for-profit organizations, though still impacted, might find it easier to attract private sponsorship and donations.

This shift could create a widening gap between commercially viable productions and small, experimental works, which often rely on grant support. The result? Fewer new, avant-garde productions and a reduction in work that pushes artistic boundaries—a shift that could dampen the vibrancy and inclusivity of American theatre.

Censorship and Creative Expression

One of my biggest concerns is the potential for increased censorship or self-censorship within the arts. Trump has a record of criticizing and condemning media and art he deems “un-American” or offensive. Under his administration, more pressure on theatre and performers to align with “patriotic” ideals could emerge, particularly in federal and state-funded institutions.

While outright censorship would be unlikely given First Amendment protections, federal funding cuts could be threatened against institutions producing “controversial” works, potentially deterring them from staging politically provocative content.

My fear is that this dynamic could lead to a form of self-censorship within the industry. Artists and organizations might opt for safer productions, steering away from projects that risk backlash. For a medium as deeply rooted in exploring the human condition and questioning societal norms as theatre, this shift could curb the range of narratives presented to the public.

Another concern I have is that a Trump administration will enable public school systems to censor theatre productions, mandate casting and creative decisions and further discriminate marginalized students. We’ve seen plenty examples of this happening in states such as Texas and I’m concerned it will spread given the results of the vote.

Social Issues and Theatre's Role in Activism

Theatre has long been a vehicle for social justice, exploring issues like racial equality, LGBTQ+ rights, and immigrant experiences. Under a Trump administration, these themes face intensified resistance, especially as the administration has historically taken regressive positions in these areas. A continuation of policies limiting LGBTQ+ rights, tightening immigration laws, or ignoring systemic racism could inspire activist responses from the theatre community.

But with federal support threatened, activism in theatre may have to shift to a grassroots approach. Nonprofits, crowdfunding, and partnerships with like-minded organizations could become increasingly vital as traditional funding streams diminish.

Now what positive things could come from a second Trump administration from the theatre arts? I believe there are some.

Renewed Emphasis on Self-Sufficiency and Innovation

If federal funding for the arts face cuts, theatres might be prompted to seek alternative funding sources, relying more on private donors, foundations, and community supporters. This could encourage theatres to build stronger relationships with their local communities and to innovate with financial strategies, thereby reducing reliance on fluctuating government budgets.

By focusing on self-sufficiency, my hope is that theatres could gain greater autonomy in their programming choices, free from the concerns of political influence that come with government funding. This independent approach could spark innovation in financing and bring theatre closer to the communities it serves, creating productions that resonate with local values and identities.

Increased Patriotism and National Pride in Theatrical Themes

Theatre has always reflected its social climate, and under a Trump administration, we might see a rise in productions that explore themes of true patriotism and national pride. This focus could encourage writers and directors to delve into aspects of American history and culture, celebrating stories of resilience, freedom, and unity. Productions like Hamilton have proven that patriotic themes, when treated with creativity and depth, can captivate audiences and foster a sense of shared heritage.

Shows exploring stories of historical figures, veterans, or the experiences of ordinary citizens working to achieve the actual American Dream might find enthusiastic audiences, promoting unity and sparking important conversations about national identity.

A Focus on Innovation in Digital Theater

The digital transformation that emerged during the pandemic has continued to reshape theatre, expanding its reach far beyond traditional stages. Under a second Trump administration, where theatre companies might face tighter budgets, digital options could provide a cost-effective means of delivering high-quality content to audiences nationwide. Online streaming, virtual reality productions, and interactive digital experiences offer new opportunities for artistic experimentation and greater accessibility.

Greater Corporate and Philanthropic Sponsorship

With possible reductions in federal arts funding, corporate sponsorship and philanthropy would likely play a more significant role in supporting the arts. This increase in private funding could bring new opportunities for the theatre industry, particularly as corporations and philanthropists step in to fill the gap.

Many companies and private patrons view supporting the arts as an essential part of their community investment, and increased private backing could lead to new collaborations and creative opportunities.

While a second Trump administration will present challenges to the theatrical arts, it could also spark new opportunities for resilience, creativity, and community connection. The arts have always found ways to adapt and even thrive under challenging circumstances. Theatre’s essence lies in its resilience, its ability to reflect society, and its power to foster community. I personally remain hopeful for the future of the art form and ready to fight for it.